This is the fourth and final entry on Hegel's "Reason in History". The first is Hegel: Reason in History, the second is Hegel and God, Spirit, Reason, Absolute, the third is Hegel and the Hero
-Up to this point, it has been shown how Hegel philosophized the idea of God, creating a new Trinity of concepts with a specific teleological end. This idea of God was dependent on humans for its actualization, occurring in the major events in human history. These events were spurred by Hegelian Heroes, men who were blank palettes for the Will of the Idea, sacrificing their own happiness and possibly that of others around them, for the progression of the actualized Idea: Freedom.
-Hegel did not think that this actualization and Freedom would come about just by means of great Heroes conducting great deeds. Instead, they had to be part of a greater system, one capable of providing the Freedom which should apply to all: the State.
Without a productive State, there is no possibility of spreading Freedom to the people. In fact, as we will see, there is no possibility of realizing the World Spirit without the State. It is this assemblage of peoples that is necessary to advance Freedom and the ends desired by God. That humans should belong to States is the Will of God.
State here should not be considered just any governance of people. Hegel defines it thusly, "the union of the subjective with the rational will; it is the moral whole". A State must be a Rational State. If it is being run by people or ideas not progressing the Freedom of all, then it is necessarily anti-Rational, for the Idea is Reason and that Reason prescribes Freedom. You can be the judge of whether those flags above represent States or dying, corrupt governments.
Morality
-The idea of an assemblage of Rational wills to make a State is dependent on the human Dialectic. We are both personal beings and public beings, in a sense. People make choices based on personal values that only affect their lives and then do actions towards the progression of the State, and thus, the Spirit.
"action is always individual; it is always I who act. It is my purpose which I want to fulfill. This purpose may be a good one, a universal aim; on the other hand, the interest may be a particular, a private one. This does not mean that it is necessarily opposed to the universal good. On the contrary, the universal must be actualized through the particular."
-It is our particular actions that bring about changes and progress in the larger, universal aims. These are the actions that are in accordance with the Spirit. Of course, sometimes, it is inevitable that the decisions we want to keep personal become all mixed up in the Spirit ones
But these seemingly "personal" actions are really the Spirit's doing, for then God gets to place a real Hero in place
Of course, in this case, God had to influence the decisions of others to instill His Will
-The actions that we do for ourselves are nothing more than personal happiness contributors, according to Hegel, they do nothing to contribute to the Spirit through the State. It is only those actions taken in accordance with the Spirit of Freedom that can be considered good. Thus, our Morality is based upon acting in accordance with the State. Fulfilling your position, with respect to the State, is the only way to act in a morally.
"The morality of the individual, then, consists in his fulfilling the duties of his social position. And it is an easy matter to know what these duties are; they are determined by this position. The substantial content of such a relationship, its rationale, is known. It is, precisely, what is called duty."
-This could be construed as a type of utilitarianism, but its not really. For it doesn't apply to each decision you make being in accordance with what is best for the greater good. It is only good to do actions which are in accordance with what is best for your State, your particular collection of Rational wills.
-Some people may seem like they are doing moral things; they may claim they are doing them for "humanity" or for the "sake of the world", but really they are only selfish actions to increase their own individual happiness.
Necessity of State
-A fine question concerning Hegel's idea on the State is why there needs to be a State in order to align with the World Spirit. If the Spirit is supposed to progress Freedom, doesn't the State take away many many freedoms? Is it not the whole idea of a government to curtail the actions of humans? No.
"This must not be understood as if the subjective will of the individual attained its gratification and enjoyment through the common will and the latter were a means for it - as if the individual limited his freedom among the other individuals, so that this common limitation, the mutual constraint of all, might secure a small space of liberty for each. (this would only be negative freedom.) Rather, law, morality, the State, and they alone, are the positive reality and satisfaction of freedom. The caprice of the individual is not freedom. It is this caprice which is being limited, the license of particular desires."
-Here we see the real Dialectic of individual and Spiritual Freedom. The State is only concerned with progressing the latter. It is not the State's duty to assure the freedom to engage in whatever acts you personally desire,
but create an organized liberty in which the State delineates rules in accordance with the Rational will of the people, and thus acts, through government, with the Will of God.
-It is only the collection of people, together, who can act as a common Spirit. It is here that we come to the idea of a collective Will, that is, the spirit of a State. This is much like what the later Heidegger stressed, a common will (what he called Being) of a group of people. This is not an incomprehensible ideal, but an actual spirit or being of the time that moves people, a common inspiration. The Germans were very heavy on this idea of Volkgeist; the volk, or the Germanic peoples, had a special role, and that role was determined by a communal spirit or will. Hegel believed that 19th century Germany was a representative of his ideal State; Heidegger fell into Nazism. To be fair, it is doubtful whether Hegel would have supported such a false-ideal State such as Hitler's Germany and there are many doubts about Heidegger's acceptance of the awful Nazi practices.
-States can outlive their usefulness and use up their moral compass. "The existence of a national spirit is broken when it has used up and exhausted itself." A Rational State is a collection of free peoples who give up some personal freedoms in order to access Freedom in the artistic, socio-political, or religious sense.
-It was for this reason that he thought that a Constitutional Monarchy was the ideal form of government. Though many people think that a Republic is the best form, those in a Constitutional Monarchy "understand that such a constitution, though ideal, cannot be realized under all circumstances. People being what they are, one has to be content with less freedom; so that the monarchical constitution, under the given circumstances and the moral condition of the people, is regarded the most useful."
MC - In the end, it was Hegel who was the idealist. Even though he stressed the "realization" of God in the world, his ideas were some of the loftiest that philosophy could offer. His stress on the "facts" and pages of history begot a philosophy riddled with loose conjectures. Maybe this is the Dialectic of Hegel. His influence, however, cannot be questioned. In the world of Continental philosophy, Hegel was a catalyst; a great spark of Passion for the future of philosophy.






























